<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>7' 9&quot; Rod Recommendations and why?</title>
        <link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/15739/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ This length rod has me again curious and wanting one! I&#39;ve read many posts here praising this particular length.

What is it about this particular rod length that is so appealing?


I prefer 7 1/2&#39; or 8&#39; rods for a 5 weight line. Medium to medium fast tapers.

Will this length rod offer anything that my preferred length rods will not?


I realize this is a quite subjective question. I am aware that several modern makers now offer this rod length. Carlin, Lancaster, Jennings, et... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:48:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/98205/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-98205</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I also have John Pickard&#39;s 795. The tip section is light and lively. John says it works best with dry flies. It&#39;s easy to overload the tip if you use
split shot. I also have John&#39;s 765 Perfectionist. That shorter rod is stiffer.
<br>
<br>
The 795 protects tippets like a champ. But I feel more limited with it on the water over the 765.
<br>
<br>
With Johns&#39; 795, you&#39;ver really gotta slow the casting stroke. The more relaxed, the better it performs. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (martketwatcher)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/98205</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:48:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/97606/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-97606</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ There are some excellent rods mentioned, I think any of them would make its owner very happy. Unfortunately I have only been able to cast a few of the
mentioned rods.
<br>
<br>
One maker who is not listed here is South Creek Ltd. Mike&#39;s John Gierach 7&#39;9&quot; taper is wonderful, poweful, smooth and progressive. This taper is
also available without buying the signiture rod.
<br>
<br>
I cast Scott&#39;s Carlin rod and it was wonderful also.
<br>
<br>
As several members have mentioned,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (poudre1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/97606</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 12:31:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/97108/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-97108</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">retrotrout wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  From previous posts, I&#39;m aware that many of you guys are into faster action rods, but I will point out that Orvis made a rod called a &quot;Pace
  <br>
  Changer&quot; that was a 7&#39; rod with a second, longer tip that made it a 7&#39;3&quot; for a 6wt line that is truly delightful to fish. They also made a
  <br>
  &quot;Midge/Nymph&quot; rod that was a 7 1/2&#39; 5wt with a second, longer tip that made it a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (David Dornblaser)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/97108</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 17:59:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/97065/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-97065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I have a 7&#39;9&quot; 3 piece for 5wt Schroeder that is a <strong>very</strong> sweet stick....
<br>
<br>
-J ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (j2t)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/97065</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/97042/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-97042</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ riverfloggin welcome to the Forum
<br>
<br>
That&#39;s a nice choice for your first cane rod. I&#39;ll bet it&#39;s not your last.
<br>
check your messages, i&#39;ve left you a note.
<br>
<br>
Retro
<br>
I forgot all about that7&#39;-6&quot; / 7&#39;-9&quot; Orvis, man I would like to cast that one some day.
<br>
<br>
Alan ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (WatercolorMan)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/97042</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96865/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96865</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I just bought my first bamboo rod, a 7&#39;9&quot; 5wt by Dennis Stone. I can&#39;t wait to get it, and I hope it lives up to the lofty praise that you all
have given to 7&#39;9&quot; rods. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (riverfloggin)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96865</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:10:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96851/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96851</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ From previous posts, I&#39;m aware that many of you guys are into faster action rods, but I will point out that Orvis made a rod called a &quot;Pace
Changer&quot; that was a 7&#39; rod with a second, longer tip that made it a 7&#39;3&quot; for a 6wt line that is truly delightful to fish. They also made a
&quot;Midge/Nymph&quot; rod that was a 7 1/2&#39; 5wt with a second, longer tip that made it a 7&#39;9&quot; rod. If you are good enough to get the rods&#39;
casting rhythms right, both will... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (retrotrout)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96851</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:37:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96776/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96776</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">David Dornblaser wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  I had a chance to cast one of Chris&#39; 7&#39;9&quot; 3/2 5 wt FTS rods this spring, that is also a nice taper. I am really happy with the SH series, I
  can&#39;t wait to fish it. I think that this stick is really going to round out my small cane quiver.
  <br>
  <br>
  www.UpperMidwestFlyFishing.com has been working with Chris and we will be donating a 7&#39;6&quot; 2/2 4 wt hollow-built SH series rod to... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (alistair59)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96776</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 23:41:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96606/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96606</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Very nice, simple elegance! Step down ferrules, now their&#39;s a rod, bet I&#39;d like! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Chip Node)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96606</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:34:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96546/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96546</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I had a chance to cast one of Chris&#39; 7&#39;9&quot; 3/2 5 wt FTS rods this spring, that is also a nice taper. I am really happy with the SH series, I
can&#39;t wait to fish it. I think that this stick is really going to round out my small cane quiver.
<br>
<br>
www.UpperMidwestFlyFishing.com has been working with Chris and we will be donating a 7&#39;6&quot; 2/2 4 wt hollow-built SH series rod to the West Fork
Sportsman&#39;s Club September 20th fund raiser to raise money for stream... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (David Dornblaser)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96546</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:15:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96539/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96539</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ David:
<br>
<br>
I believe my rod may be the one to which you refer. I&#39;ve posted photos of it on both the fishing and collecting boards. 
<br>
<br>
I received it in October 2007 and it is a truly great taper. Very light in the hand and the finish work is impeccable. Poudre1 casted it at this year&#39;s
Colorado Cane Conclave and seemed to really like it. We mixed it in with some PHY tapers and it seemed to compare very, very well.
<br>
<br>
I&#39;m quite sure yours will become a favorite!... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Flyman615)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96539</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:26:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96526/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96526</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ David,
<br>
<br>
Jason Borger laid out 100&#39;+ of line with one of Chris&#39;s rods like yours at the Camp Sherman Bamboo Rod Fair last weekend.
<br>
I had the opportunity to cast it a bit later, it&#39;s a super nice rod, really smooth power. I&#39;m sure you will enjoy fishing it. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (greg hall)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96526</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:21:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96521/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96521</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">David Dornblaser wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  A Chris Carlin SH795 2/2 hollow-built rod showed up on my door step the other day. It is a gorgeous rod, I will post pics as soon as I take some. I had an
  opportunity to cast the rod for about an hour. It is both smooth and powerful. I hope that to have the opportunity to fish it soon. Hopper season is almost
  here. <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif" alt="image">
  <br>
  <br>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (seattlesetters)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96521</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:32:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96520/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96520</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ A Chris Carlin SH795 2/2 hollow-built rod showed up on my door step the other day. It is a gorgeous rod, I will post pics as soon as I take some. I had an
opportunity to cast the rod for about an hour. It is both smooth and powerful. I hope that to have the opportunity to fish it soon. Hopper season is almost
here. <img src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/glasses.gif">
<br>
<br>
Another poster on this board has posted about his 7&#39;9&quot; Carlin 5 wt as being semi-hollow. I was a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (David Dornblaser)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96520</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96297/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96297</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Dennis
<br>
<br>
Your rod sure looks great along with the Winston Perfect. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (WatercolorMan)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96297</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96256/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96256</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m a little late coming to this conversation....
<br>
<br>
I had for a while a 7&#39;9&quot; Pickard--truly a beautiful rod, a little idiosyncratic, but also personable--it&#39;s the sort of rod that works *with* you
if you let it.  I later obtained a Leon Hanson 7&#39;9&quot; 2/2 that was more easy-going.  Both were 5 weights, both fine rods, but both very different.  In
the end I kept the Hanson and sold the Pickard, not because I prefer Blondes over Brunettes, but because the Hanson... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bearbutt)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96256</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:38:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96042/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96042</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ A Goodwin Granger 8040 taper shortened to 7&#39;9&quot; makes a sweet med-fast 4wt. 7&#39;9&quot; LL Bean Anniversary rod by Lacey is made from the Goodwin
taper.
<br>
<br>
Dennis
<br>
<br>
Here&#39;s a pic of my Lacey Royal 7&#39;9&quot; 3/2 4/5 wt. 3.5oz. ala FET w/full intermediates. This was the prototype for LLBean Anniversary.
<br>
<br>
<img src="http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa297/firehole/May312.jpg" alt="image"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (firehole)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96042</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:03:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/96041/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-96041</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It is so much easier when on the water to restring a 7&#39;9&quot; versus a 8&#39; rod that I thought it  was a good reason for it. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (hatch1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/96041</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:55:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/95891/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-95891</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Teter
<br>
<br>
After reading your post I pulled out my Tonka Queen, which I lawn cast today. What a nice 5-weight taper, A lot of reserve power with the big swell.
<br>
<br>
I really like my Lew Parks rods, I have his 8012 H.B.&amp; 7613 H.B. so I&#39;m not suprised to hear you like his Payne 79 4-weight.
<br>
<br>
I have a Brooks Payne para 7&#39;9&quot; 5-wt. rod it it&#39;s real nice to fish with. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (WatercolorMan)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/95891</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 03:32:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/95503/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html#reply-95503</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">seattlesetters wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  I completely defer to Bill Oyster on this (wow!!!!), and agree 100%. I just wanted to add: I am vehemently <span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-STYLE: italic">not</span> a &quot;jack-of-all-trades,&quot; one-rod sort of guy. I am totally into precision, and using just the
  right tool for the job. I would get 20 rods if that&#39;s what it took to be equipped for every trout fishing situation.
  <br>
  <br>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (greg hall)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/95503</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 11:53:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 7' 9" Rod Recommendations and why? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/15739/t/7-9-Rod-Recommendations-and-why-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This length rod has me again curious and wanting one! I&#39;ve read many posts here praising this particular length.
<br>
What is it about this particular rod length that is so appealing?
<br>
<br>
I prefer 7 1/2&#39; or 8&#39; rods for a 5 weight line. Medium to medium fast tapers.
<br>
Will this length rod offer anything that my preferred length rods will not?
<br>
<br>
I realize this is a quite subjective question. I am aware that several modern makers now offer this rod length. Carlin,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobbeegee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/15739</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>