<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Old vs. New</title>
        <link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/20151/t/Old-vs-New.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Now, this is just my opinion, so take it as offered. I&#39;ve divested myself of all the old cane I used to fish, except for an Orvis that is by and large one
of my favorite rods and bullet proof, to boot. The reason is partly because I got tired of maintaining them and locating original parts to replace anything
that needed it and the only ones I could afford just didn&#39;t cut the mustard in the taper department. Now, I just fish the new rods, new tapers that I have
(new tapers because... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:26:12 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:31:03 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119873/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-119873</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ For the collector, I can well understand the desire for the older, classic rods. But I&#39;m just a fisherman, and while I have owned a few of the older rods,
I would rather put my wampum these days into the new age rods. The bamboo itself does not change, so you can have the benefit of the tapers of the old rods
combined with the modern adhesives and finishes. That way, I can have the best of both worlds. It doesn&#39;t get any better from the perspective of a
fisherman. I could never afford... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (wb4tjh)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119873</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119861/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-119861</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I agree with you Bill, even a newly built rod takes on real meaning when you&#39;ve spent that kind of time in crafting it.
<br>
<br>
<br>
Tim ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (oldschoolcane)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119861</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 11:59:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119794/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-119794</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Canewrap-</p>

<p>Somewhat off topic, but did you ever listen to David Kincaid, The Irish Volunteer?</p>

<p>CnA<a target="_blank" href="http://hauntedfieldmusic.com/Description.html"><br></a><a target="_blank" href="http://hauntedfieldmusic.com/Description.html">http://hauntedfieldmusic.com/Description.html</a></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CANEnABLE)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119794</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:09:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119790/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-119790</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Great story, Bill. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (teter)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119790</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119788/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-119788</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, its been great reading the mix of opinions and I don&#39;t disagree with the guys that love the oldies, no sir, not one bit. But, for me I&#39;ve finally
got a rod that I will fish most of the time. I started out building this rod 7 years ago and it took almost two years to finish it (stolen moments to work on
it, is why so long). But, this rod has a lot of karma in it. My young son helped at times to do some sanding or help me with straightening strips, he was just
curious what dad was... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Canewrap)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119788</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:32:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119477/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-119477</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I like both classics and new rods for most of the reasons already discussed. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (steeldog94)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119477</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:10:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119078/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-119078</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well.....I am preaching to the choir here but everyone has there own views - I&#39;d prefer to fish my older cane rods versus the newest versions. Why not fish
with a piece of history? I can&#39;t look at an older Edwards or Granger and not wonder what happened to the people that built that rod, what happened to the
original owner of the rod? I think that prior to WWII, owning a Heddon Model 17 was a big deal and even today I appreciate the same rod. In a similar fashion,
I now own my uncles... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (oldschoolcane)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119078</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:46:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119035/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-119035</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I like to mix &#39;em up. I&#39;ll fish the old stuff. for a while, then switch to a new rod or two....sometimes in the same day. It&#39;s fun to compare
the actions when you&#39;re fishing the same water with different rods. It&#39;s also fun to fish different water with the same rod.
<br>
  I came to the conclusion some time ago that today&#39;s rods are for the most part better made --I&#39;m sure part of that is that the older rods  I have are
predominantly production rods. On the other... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (teter)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119035</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:57:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119027/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-119027</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I respectfully defer to the gentleman from the &quot;Show Me&quot; state.<img height="15" src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/wink.gif" width="15" alt="image">
<br>
&quot;Kannscht du mekke fonge?&quot;
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CANEnABLE)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119027</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:07:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/118959/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-118959</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ CANEnABLE.....please forgive me but allow me to re-phoeneticize your Pennsylvania Dutch saying to Missouri German...&quot;ve grow too soon oldt und too late
schmart&quot;. Entirely the same thing but I like the phoenetics better....hehe. And as I said, please forgive me.
<br>
<br>
Vic ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (sharps4590)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/118959</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:36:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/118915/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-118915</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Boo wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Those that know me, know I love old rods..........</span>
    <br style="FONT-STYLE: italic">
    <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">Why???</span>
    <br style="FONT-STYLE: italic">
    <span style="FONT-STYLE: italic">The feel, I have cast many current rods and none I have found have the feel.</span>
    <br style="FONT-STYLE: italic">
    <span style="FONT-STYLE:... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bdcanefly)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/118915</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:33:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/118894/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-118894</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ My favorite 4 weight is both. A 7½&#39; L &amp; C, (Heddon), the one original tip that came with it casts fine, but takes a set very easily. But with the new
tip by AJ, it&#39;s an altogether splendid rod. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (mac7x)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/118894</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:40:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/118847/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-118847</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Sorry CANEWARP and CANEaBLE, got you mixed up with each other.<img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/smile.gif" alt="image"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (aquabonito)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/118847</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 05:56:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/118835/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-118835</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This is simple . . . . Like the song says . . . . &quot;Love the one your with&quot; ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (WatercolorMan)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/118835</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 03:36:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/118799/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-118799</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">aquabonito wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  CANEaBLE,
  <br>
  <br>
  Why are you bothering to post on this forum? Seems to me you should be posting elsewhere on some neo fly rod forum! <img alt="image" src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/tongue.gif">
</blockquote>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">Dear Angry,</p>

<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">Nice to meet &#39;ya.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal"... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (CANEnABLE)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/118799</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:34:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/118764/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-118764</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ OLD vs New your topic is something I&#39;m right smack in the middle of.
<br>
I&#39;ve just turned a little life milestone and only now I can be more serious with Bamboo.
<br>
<br>
I just sat down and started laying out a plan for building my rod collection (i was laying out a 12 year plan)....and my first choice was do I build around
some of the builders of the past ...or do I start building with contemporary builders . I made the decision to build my collection with the builders of today.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Pete from MA)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/118764</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:53:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/118748/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-118748</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ CANEaBLE,
<br>
<br>
Why are you bothering to post on this forum?  Seems to me you should be posting elsewhere on some neo fly rod forum!  <img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/tongue.gif" alt="image"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (aquabonito)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/118748</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:14:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/118732/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-118732</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <span style="font-style: italic;">I love to take old tackle apart and see how it was made.....</span> <span style="font-style: italic;"><br>
figuring out some of our ancestors did things.
<br>
<br></span>Me too.  <span style="font-style: italic;"><br></span> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (tedgolden)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/118732</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:05:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/118725/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-118725</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I like the history of our sport and like to fish all sorts of old rods to get a feel for how older techniques worked.  I get a kick out of that.  Most of the
old techniques work pretty well BTW.  However, if I am going on a trip, hiking into a remote spot, or an leaving a rod in my car in case fishing appeals to me
on my commute home then I will be a new rod or a glass or graphite rod that can take some abuse.
<br>
<br>
I too am engineer and purchase 100 year old more or less rods that need... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (JeffK)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/118725</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:47:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/116472/t/Old-vs-New.html#reply-116472</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Pretty tough making sweeping generalizations about feel, quality, action, etc. in new vs. old.  Very old rods I think tend to be slower but there are plenty of
examples of vintage rods (1940 and later) that have wonderful action and feel and are equal to anything being built today.  When I fish vintage rods, it&#39;s
not at all that they feel or cast better than my new rods, but rather that I enjoy using a finely crafted tool that has gone through the hands of many before
me. 
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (tiptop)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/116472</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:26:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Old vs. New ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/20151/t/Old-vs-New.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Now, this is just my opinion, so take it as offered. I&#39;ve divested myself of all the old cane I used to fish, except for an Orvis that is by and large one
of my favorite rods and bullet proof, to boot. The reason is partly because I got tired of maintaining them and locating original parts to replace anything
that needed it and the only ones I could afford just didn&#39;t cut the mustard in the taper department. Now, I just fish the new rods, new tapers that I have
(new tapers because... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Canewrap)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/20151</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 03:26:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>