<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods</title>
        <link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/20322/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Not being a bamboo rod maker, and never having cast a hollowbuilt rod, I have an angler laymans question for the builders and fishers of hollowbuilt rods.


If someone put a hollowbuilt rod in my hand, not telling me it was a hollowbuilt, and said &quot;try this one&quot;, could I truly feel that the rod was
somehow different from my solid built rod? Could anyone pick up the same rod and state emphatically &quot;that&#39;s a great HB rod&quot; without knowing it
was?

I guess my question is,... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:03:09 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/120517/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-120517</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well Jeremy, I&#39;m still amazed at the sometimes passionate responses this thread seems to have generated.
<br>
I&#39;m also glad that it seems to have stimulated a few to maybe re-think how they view hollowbuilt rods?
<br>
<br>
It was, in my opinion, a very simple question that somehow &quot;got lost in translation?&quot;
<br>
<br>
As previously stated, &quot;if you can not live and fish without a hollowbuilt, and it totally trips your trigger, then fish on with &#39;em my brother!!&quot;... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobbeegee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/120517</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:03:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/120379/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-120379</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">creakycane wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  I was PM&#39;d by a board member who argues that the loss of bamboo feel in hollowbuilt rods comes from the loss of mass throughout the rod - his words were
  along the lines that the &quot;rod casts itself nature&quot; of many well designed cane tapers loses something when hollowed, since mass is lost through the
  rod and thus the same momentum transfer to the line requires a faster stroke (too fast, is his... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (thegubster)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/120379</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:00:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/120340/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-120340</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hi Larry  I&#39;m afraid noone in my field would believe me. It&#39;s a wacky but fun group.
<br>
<br>
Bob ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bob2935)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/120340</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:32:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/120178/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-120178</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ So Bob2939,
<br>
Are you taking notes on this group then ? <img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/tongue.gif" alt="image">
<br>
Please be sure to give individual credit if using
<br>
any of us as subjects in future professional papers.
<br>
OK, you can use handles and not real names if
<br>
yer afraid of legal actions.
<br>
<br>
Larry Swearingen
<br>
New Hoosier
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Larry Swearingen)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/120178</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:30:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/120148/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-120148</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>I work in the mental health field and I am getting some major staff meeting flashbacks right now. Over analyzing and over processing is the nature of people
in my field. In one staff meeting I blurted out &quot; I expect you guys to be processing your bowel movements at any second&quot;. What I am getting at is
that this topic is exhausting. Remember keep it simple and do not wallow in theory. Obviously we all like different tapers and styles of rods. We all have
different casting styles... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bob2935)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/120148</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:09:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119940/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119940</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thanks 16 PMD - I agree, it seems you can keep the sweetness (if hollowed carefully and the internal taper is optimized) and improve responsiveness, especially
in those over 8&#39; 4 and 5 wts.  Thanks for your thoughts!
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (creakycane)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119940</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:06:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119903/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119903</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ As a big fan of hollow rods, I see your point and sort of agree with it. I think hollowing improves the PERFORMANCE of a rod, but I can see that it can lessen
that sweet self-loading feel that some solid rods have. They have that nice, subtle swing from the butt that makes them feel like they cast themselves.
It&#39;s analagous to the big luxury car that has the nice smooth ride, but may not corner or accelerate as well as a higher performance car with stiffer
suspension. You trade off some... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (16 pmd)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119903</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:27:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119894/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119894</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I was PM&#39;d by a board member who argues that the loss of bamboo feel in hollowbuilt rods comes from the loss of mass throughout the rod - his words were
along the lines that the &quot;rod casts itself nature&quot; of many well designed cane tapers loses something when hollowed, since mass is lost through the
rod and thus the same momentum transfer to the line requires a faster stroke (too fast, is his argument) - this is certainly true (I think) in graphite rods,
if I am getting my... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (creakycane)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119894</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:49:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119612/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119612</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hi Bobby,
<br>
I don&#39;t think you could just pick up a built rod and state one way or another whether it was hollowbuilt.  Aluminum seat vs. nickel silver vs. type of wood
spacer....Super swiss, SD, truncated, or micro ferrules...it all changes the weight of the finished rod.
<br>
<br>
Casting it would be another story, if the rod was done right.
<br>
<br>
Removing mass from the rod makes it start faster/easier and stop faster/easier.  The rod can dampen quicker.  Means less line bounce.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Hollowbuilt)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119612</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:39:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119601/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119601</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>I agree.  It reminds me of a similar  &quot;argument&quot; I get in with some of my plastic rod fishing friends..........</p>

<p>&quot;By god there is no way I&#39;m fishing one of those expensive wood rods until you explain to me exactly why they are better than graphite, and I mean
I need to know the exact scientific information that explains to me in a robust manner how they are significantly better, and  I don&#39;t want to hear the fru
fru crap about them being pretty and historical.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cwood)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119601</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119594/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119594</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ this is starting to remind me of a Monty Python skit..... and i think you know which one i mean...
<br>
i will engage in argument but not simple contradiction
<br>
bye
<br>
aj ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (AJ Bamboo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119594</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 03:59:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119499/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119499</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If a hollow built rod somehow makes that much difference to you, then please buy and fish the heck out of it.
<br>
I just can not see the advantage it offers over a solid built rod. If you want a 4 weight in a certain length then buy a HB 4 weight if that&#39;s the design
rod you prefer. In my opinion, some builders solid built 4 weights would offer you the same performance, if not, then drop down to a 3 weight solid built.
Whatever!
<br>
<br>
My simple question was.........if someone handed... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobbeegee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119499</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119492/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119492</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Mountains,
<br>
<br>
Thank you for your input. Your side-by-side comparison is informative and is appreciated.
<br>
<br>
- David ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (David Dornblaser)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119492</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 18:52:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119419/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119419</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I admit to being confused a little by the reception (including the half-dozen outside communications); the concept of a side-by-side comparison was at the
genesis of this thread.
<br>
<br>
Having added that to this discussion, I think I&#39;ll bow out. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (MountainsAllAround)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119419</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:01:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119398/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119398</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Bill,
<br>
<br>
Yes, it makes sense. And, I assume that is why some tapers take to hollow-building, while others do not; and, why hollow-builders often tweak tapers or design
their own.
<br>
<br>
Creakycane, yes, I have half a dozen, or so, hollow-built rods with a few more on the way.
<br>
<br>
- David ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (David Dornblaser)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119398</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:10:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119369/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119369</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m not sure why MountainsAllAround&#39;s example wouldn&#39;t be a suitable comparison.  He sounds like he&#39;s buddies with Chris Raine and said he cast
two rods identical to each other minus the hollowing.  He said he noticed a difference.  What&#39;s the confusion?  Someone asked if anyone had cast two
identical tapers from the same maker, one solid and one hollow, someone gives an example of that exact situation and relays their perceived results, and then
folks say that... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cwood)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119369</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 08:01:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119347/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119347</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If I wanted a 8&#39; 3 piece 4 wt., I would just buy one of those rods, solid built, instead of a 8&#39; 3 piece 5 wt. solid built.
<br>
<br>
bob ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobbeegee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119347</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 00:19:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119342/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119342</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">oysterbamboo wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">David Dornblaser wrote:</strong>
    <hr>

    <blockquote>
      <strong class="quote-title">creakycane wrote:</strong>
      <hr>

      <p>I&#39;m not sure that is the most relevant comparison -I would think that when a maker offers, for example, as 8&#39; 3pc 5 wt in both hollow and
      solid versions, that the oustside taper of the rod is NOT necessarily the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (creakycane)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119342</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:38:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119334/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119334</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">David Dornblaser wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    <strong class="quote-title">creakycane wrote:</strong>
    <hr>

    <p>I&#39;m not sure that is the most relevant comparison -I would think that when a maker offers, for example, as 8&#39; 3pc 5 wt in both hollow and solid
    versions, that the oustside taper of the rod is NOT necessarily the same in both cases.....
    <br></p>
  </blockquote>
  <br>
  <br>
  Is that true? Why would the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (oysterbamboo)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119334</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/119332/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html#reply-119332</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ In the context of this discussion, I think comparing two &quot;identical&quot; rods (save the hollowing) is the perfect way to illustrate the effect of
hollowing, though your mileage may vary based on the sophistication of the methods used to hollow a rod.
<br>
<br>
And without giving away a lot (partly because I don&#39;t understand it, I just watch him do it), but I&#39;ve watched Raine muck around with the <span style="font-style: italic;">internal</span> taper more than the outside taper,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (MountainsAllAround)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/119332</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:37:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Hollowbuilt versus solid built rods ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/20322/t/Hollowbuilt-versus-solid-built-rods.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Not being a bamboo rod maker, and never having cast a hollowbuilt rod, I have an angler laymans question for the builders and fishers of hollowbuilt rods.
<br>
<br>
If someone put a hollowbuilt rod in my hand, not telling me it was a hollowbuilt, and said &quot;try this one&quot;, could I truly feel that the rod was
somehow different from my solid built rod? Could anyone pick up the same rod and state emphatically &quot;that&#39;s a great HB rod&quot; without knowing it
was?
<br>
I guess my... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobbeegee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/20322</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>