http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/21771/t/Payne-101L.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:41:39 GMT Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:42:15 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/21771/t/Payne-101L.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/133687/t/Payne-101L.html#reply-133687 gloucesteroldspot wrote:

---

Working on the principle that deflection varies as the fouth power of diameter, a rod twice as thick is sixteen times as stiff or, looked at the other way around, a rod half as thick will be one sixteenth as stiff.


It works for substantial changes, but I'm not sure if we should be taking another factor involving the proportional depth of power fibres into account.
... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Battenkiller) http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/133687 Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:09:17 GMT http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/125418/t/Payne-101L.html#reply-125418
Working on that premise, it should... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (gloucesteroldspot) http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/125418 Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:16:46 GMT http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/125392/t/Payne-101L.html#reply-125392 I was curious if there was a standard math formula that was used in the shop to change a standard taper to a light version (say a 5wt to a 4wt)? and with those experiments you mentioned, how many rods got tossed out and how many actually made it into customers hands?
best to you as well,
johnr

edit:
Hal: did the 101L rods use step down ferrules or standard ferrules?? ]]> feeds@yuku.com (johnr) http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/125392 Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:49:41 GMT http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/125215/t/Payne-101L.html#reply-125215 Best Hal. ]]> feeds@yuku.com (halbacon) http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/125215 Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:27:53 GMT http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/125047/t/Payne-101L.html#reply-125047 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (crcaddis) http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/125047 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:06:14 GMT http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/124675/t/Payne-101L.html#reply-124675
I have seen a lot of Payne's over the years and I must say that I have never heard of or seen a rod with that model designation. I do think that if there was a 101L you would probably be right that it would be similar to a 100-H although the 100-H is a definite 5 wt.

Tim Zietak ]]> feeds@yuku.com (quadrate) http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/124675 Sat, 21 Feb 2009 03:43:01 GMT http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/21771/t/Payne-101L.html I can not for the life of me find the taper for a 101L
Does anyone know if the 101L is the same taper as a 100H ?
here is the link to the previous discussion
http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/11380

thanks

johnr ]]> feeds@yuku.com (johnr) http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/21771 Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:41:39 GMT