<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Banty Rod - Length of handle vs action</title>
        <link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/23169/t/Banty-Rod-Length-of-handle-vs-action.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Hello - newbie here ...


Wanting to get into bamboo and a friend suggested this site.  I recently picked up a South Bend 359-9 that needs some tlc and one of the thoughts I have is to
make it a banty rod.  Most of the banty rods I&#39;ve seen suggest cutting the butt section down and mounting a handle so the ferrule is under the cork handle
- the ferrule edge basically becomes a winding check.  If I do this the overall length of the rod would be around 6 to 6 1/2&#39;.  What I&#39;d like to... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:39:39 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:57:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Banty Rod - Length of handle vs action ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/133575/t/Banty-Rod-Length-of-handle-vs-action.html#reply-133575</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Make sure to post photos when you&#39;re done working on it. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (oldboyscout)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/133575</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:57:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Banty Rod - Length of handle vs action ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/133345/t/Banty-Rod-Length-of-handle-vs-action.html#reply-133345</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">oldboyscout wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  bantys are fun, but don&#39;t be afraid to redo that rod and fish it as is- 9&#39;. It&#39;s a good taper, just needs more guides. Unless you&#39;re fishing
  tiny streams, there&#39;s nothing wrong with a 9&#39; rod-I know they&#39;re out of style though.

  <p>Then get that butt section and make the handle for the banty.</p>
</blockquote>Thats the plan - I&#39;m waiting for the other butt section to arrive and... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (skondolf)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/133345</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:23:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Banty Rod - Length of handle vs action ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132711/t/Banty-Rod-Length-of-handle-vs-action.html#reply-132711</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ bantys are fun, but don&#39;t be afraid to redo that rod and fish it as is- 9&#39;. It&#39;s a good taper, just needs more guides. Unless you&#39;re fishing
tiny streams, there&#39;s nothing wrong with a 9&#39; rod-I know they&#39;re out of style though.

<p>Then get that butt section and make the handle for the banty.</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (oldboyscout)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132711</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 11:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Banty Rod - Length of handle vs action ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132315/t/Banty-Rod-Length-of-handle-vs-action.html#reply-132315</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hi Jack - (gee, never say that on an airplane)
<br>
<br>
I&#39;d love to get down to Roscoe for the ceremonies on Saturday but there&#39;s no way I can make the drive. Some day ... some day. I have been talking to
John (CJ) about a lot of this too and he&#39;s been giving me some pointers/suggestions. Cane is all new to me - only cane I&#39;ve ever cast was JB&#39;s last
fall at the one-fly and that wasn&#39;t even on the water.
<br>
<br>
I know the chances this will be a &quot;decent casting... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (skondolf)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132315</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:11:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Banty Rod - Length of handle vs action ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132231/t/Banty-Rod-Length-of-handle-vs-action.html#reply-132231</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It doesn&#39;t hurt to tape a reel in the two positions. The section sticking out has nothing to do with anything. You don&#39;t need to cut it off to really
feel the result. The only problem I see with leaving the butt section a little long is that the deflection will stop at the lower ferrule. Placing the ferrule
at the winding check mimics a swell at that same position. The consensus of opinion around here is that 2 of 3 bantys are pretty iffy. Don ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Zenkoanhead)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132231</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:46:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Banty Rod - Length of handle vs action ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132223/t/Banty-Rod-Length-of-handle-vs-action.html#reply-132223</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Steve,
<br>
If you can make it take a ride over to Roscoe Sat. we will give you all the cane you can handle to cast before you perform surgery.
<br>
I did what you are contemplating back in the early 70&#39;s when I was paying child support for 4 siblings.  I didn&#39;t leave the feerule on, just used the
top 2 sections of a 9 footer.  It was an ok brookie rod but that&#39;s all.  It&#39;s still here somewhere hasn&#39;t been out since the kids got educated and
jobs.
<br>
Jack ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (luzerne1)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132223</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:16:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Banty Rod - Length of handle vs action ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132217/t/Banty-Rod-Length-of-handle-vs-action.html#reply-132217</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Not screwy sounding at all. I tried that but with the rest of the handle sticking out behind it doesn&#39;t feel &quot;right&quot; no matter what I do. I guess
I could cut the butt section down to include the extra 8&quot; or so and somehow dry-fit a reel to it and cast that way. (duct tape is a beautiful thing) If I
don&#39;t like it I can always cut the 8&quot; off. I didn&#39;t know if there was a &quot;rule of thumb&quot; regarding action when doing something like this.
I know it&#39;s... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (skondolf)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132217</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:27:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Banty Rod - Length of handle vs action ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132185/t/Banty-Rod-Length-of-handle-vs-action.html#reply-132185</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Steve,
<br>
This might seem a little screwy buy try assembling the rod (no reel) , line up the top two sections. Now grab the rod at just below the butt ferrule and do
some casting. The move your hand down 8 or 10&quot; and try again. Should give you a pretty good idea how the cut down rod will cast. I think the 9&#39;, 359
was a six weight...probably a good place to start but try a five too.
<br>
Dennis ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (troutwings)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132185</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Banty Rod - Length of handle vs action ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/23169/t/Banty-Rod-Length-of-handle-vs-action.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hello - newbie here ...
<br>
<br>
Wanting to get into bamboo and a friend suggested this site.  I recently picked up a South Bend 359-9 that needs some tlc and one of the thoughts I have is to
make it a banty rod.  Most of the banty rods I&#39;ve seen suggest cutting the butt section down and mounting a handle so the ferrule is under the cork handle
- the ferrule edge basically becomes a winding check.  If I do this the overall length of the rod would be around 6 to 6 1/2&#39;.  What I&#39;d... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (skondolf)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/23169</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:39:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>