<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Most supple fly line</title>
        <link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/23203/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ What is the most supple fly line out there (not silk)?  I&#39;m looking to replace a few fly lines and have been using Cortland 444 peach because it remains
supple in cold water.  Also, it has to be a DT.  Any thoughts? ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:08:39 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:49:58 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132429/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132429</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thanks for all the responses guys.  I do fish a few of the sylks, I just don&#39;t think they float very well compared to the 444 Peach, but they are
definately more supple. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Slate Drake 9)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132429</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:49:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132383/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132383</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ next year?
<br>
<br>
The Super Supra Ultra V?
<br>
<br>
bobbyg   <img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/wink.gif" alt="image"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobbeegee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132383</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:17:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132378/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132378</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fanwing &amp; Arctic Grayling...
<br>
<br>
Thanks for the marketing update.  I haven&#39;t shopped for a new line since purchasing my Ultra IV late last year, so I wasn&#39;t aware of the name change
and would have just assumed one more good thing had been discontinued. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (flyfisher43)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132378</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 14:47:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132361/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132361</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">bobbeegee wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  flyfisher!
  <br>
  <br>
  I suppose the IV is just the new and improved III? Still available in the buckskin color?
  <br>
  <br>
  Bob
</blockquote>Hasn&#39;t the IV recently been discontinued and replaced by the new Supra line?  If it is the same line it still comes in the buckskin and
sunrise colors.
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Arctic Grayling)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132361</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:26:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132358/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132358</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Ultra 3 changed to Ultra 4 and now this year it is  labeled as the Supra.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Fanwing)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132358</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:07:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132344/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132344</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <hr>
bobbeegee wrote:
<br>
I suppose the IV is just the new and improved III? Still available in the buckskin color?
<br>
<hr>

<br>
That&#39;s my understanding--and yes, I use only the buckskin color, a nice complement to bamboo rods. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (flyfisher43)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132344</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:15:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132332/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132332</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Monic MDT! ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (mr flymph)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132332</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:17:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132311/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132311</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;ve posted this before, but in my experience the &quot;suppleness&quot; of Cortland Sylk and H&amp;H (made by Cortland) is the same -- very supple even in
cold weather.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (tiptop)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132311</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132303/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132303</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Cortland Sylk. For sure in the winter.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Rolf Jacobsen)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132303</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:11:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132300/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132300</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Sylk, by far the most supple plastic line I have ever seen. good line. dont fish it often enough, not sure why... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (maruoff)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132300</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:10:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132297/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132297</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I find the Scientific Anglers Supreme 2 Ivory lines work really well on bamboo rods. They are supple and slick with very little memory and that ivory colour
looks right on a cane rod.<img title="happy" src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/happy.gif" alt="image"> Tried out some new H&amp;H
lines this past weekend and they too were very supple and floated nice and high, but I couldn&#39;t help feeling they felt light for their designated weights.
Very impressive lines all... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (tight loops)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132297</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:39:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132267/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132267</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ flyfisher!
<br>
<br>
I suppose the IV is just the new and improved III? Still available in the buckskin color?
<br>
<br>
Bob ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobbeegee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132267</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:50:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132265/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132265</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <hr>
<strong>bobbeegee wrote</strong>:
<br>
Is the III still available?
<br>
<hr>

<br>
You can still find NOS (or barely used) Ultra IIIs as closeouts or in vintage tackle catalogs/websites.  I recently purchased a IV, but haven&#39;t cast it
yet.
<br>
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (flyfisher43)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132265</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:40:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132261/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132261</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Cortland &quot;Clear Creek&quot;.
<br>
<br>
Hands-down the best fly line I have ever used. Supple, but not soft, with an extra-long front-end taper and very gradual rear taper to a fine level
rear/&quot;shooting&quot; line (although it&#39;s not really a WF or LB). I tie my own leaders and if you use a .017 leader butt (as I do), the next step up is
the tip-end of the line.
<br>
<br>
Introduced around1995 and still the best leader-to-line transition and delicate fly presentation of any fly... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Blue Quill)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132261</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:10:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132253/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132253</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ My top choices for most flexible/least memory would be Sylk (my favorite winter line), SA XPS ; then the H&amp;H, which I think is a really good all-around
line-- I have three H&amp;Hs in 4,5, and 6--, then the Cortland 444. All DTs, all weather all the time. All good. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Wyfish)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132253</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132239/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132239</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Rio Selective Trout is quite supple. But my newfound favorite is the Scientific Anglers Shark Skin ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (canerodscom)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132239</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:07:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132238/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132238</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">flyfisher43 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  I like the SA Ultra series, especially the III (haven&#39;t yet tried the IV). Cortland Sylk is a close second.
</blockquote>
<br>
Is the III still available?
<br>
<br>
Bob
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobbeegee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132238</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:03:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132210/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132210</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I like the SA Ultra series, especially the III (haven&#39;t yet tried the IV).  Cortland Sylk is a close second. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (flyfisher43)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132210</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:42:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132203/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132203</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;ll second the Rio and add Hook &amp; Hackle to the list. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (ellensdad)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132203</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:09:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/132188/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html#reply-132188</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Cortland Sylk is, IMHO, more supple than Peach. I also like the Rio Selective Trout II lines for cold water performance, and SA Mastery XPS. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (seattlesetters)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/132188</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:12:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Most supple fly line ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/23203/t/Most-supple-fly-line.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What is the most supple fly line out there (not silk)?  I&#39;m looking to replace a few fly lines and have been using Cortland 444 peach because it remains
supple in cold water.  Also, it has to be a DT.  Any thoughts? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Slate Drake 9)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/23203</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:08:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>