<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>7 1/2' 4wt tapers</title>
        <link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/23581/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I&#39;m in the process of getting a new blank built and was looking for ideals for a 7 1/2&#39;4wt.  I originally thought about a Garrison the 2 tapers I&#39;d
considered was a 206 and a 209.  Yes the 206 is mainly referenced as a 5wt and the one I cast was a true 5 but strangely I&#39;ve seen the 209 listed as a 4wt
but what didn&#39;t make sence to me was all the numbers are bigger on the 209.  Another I&#39;d thought of was a Payne 100 but I own a 100h and really
don&#39;t care for the way... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:19:24 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:35:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/143928/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-143928</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I found a picture on the net and it looks like I used standard CSE ferrules.
<br>
<br>
Jim. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Jim Lowe)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/143928</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:54:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/141939/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-141939</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Jim Lowe and Jayhake:
<br>
<br>
do either of you recall what type of ferrule you used on this taper?
<br>
super Z or step downs??
<br>
<br>
thanks
<br>
<br>
johnr ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (johnr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/141939</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:24:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/139147/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-139147</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Perfectionist or 7612, I like both with a swelled butt.
<br>
john ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (john channer)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/139147</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 22:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/138835/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-138835</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I agree with Jim. After a conversation with him, I helped a friend of mine build a stretched 97. A sweet, sweet rod. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jayhake)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/138835</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:45:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/138825/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-138825</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Mike,
<br>
<br>
I made one quite by accident once. I basically extended the mid. I was making the proper version and would have had my splines slightly longer than needed for
a 7ft rod. They were probably 44 inches long or so, long enough to get a 71/2 rod and be confused as why there wasn&#39;t any extra cane. Anyway, I probably
set the rod up 0 to 44 and 42 to 84, or 0 to 45 and 42 to 84 with the last 2 or 3 inches level. The point here is that I probably ended up with a reverse drop
at the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Jim Lowe)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/138825</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:28:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/138441/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-138441</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Jim,
<br>
I was looking at the graph on the 97 in the 7 1/2&#39; version and did like the way it appears to flex over the 100 and 100h.  I also noticed at least the
taper I found to be the same as the 7&#39; 97 only with the next dimension (90) at the butt end being duplicated.  I&#39;ll be casting a 97 in the near future
by my friend who will make the blank his being a 7&#39; rod that should give me a better ideal.  I also found a thread on the 97 in both length.  Anyone else
care to comment... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (mtn)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/138441</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:58:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/138400/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-138400</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ MHO. A stretched out Payne 97 is a much better rod than the Payne 100. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Jim Lowe)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/138400</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 23:16:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137788/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-137788</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ You may wish to consider the Heddon Featherweight or the &quot;Extra Light Trout&quot;.
<br>
<br>
Bob ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobbeegee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137788</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 17:30:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137612/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-137612</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ My votes for your needs would be:
<br>
Granger 7&#39;6&quot;
<br>
Payne 100
<br>
Leonard 39 or 49
<br>
These are classic progressive tapers, just make sure you get good numbers, and a good builder. It would be best if you could use/fish the rod that you would
eventually have built. Any one of the rods listed above could end up a 5wt if &#39;things&#39; go even a little wonky in the build. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Peales)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137612</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/135587/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-135587</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Also, you could stretch a Payne 97 t0 7.5 feet, there are published tapers for that. A Granger 7.5 4wt taper, AJ Thramer&#39;s DX taper, a Powell 7642, and the
Leonard 39 (as previously mentioned), all come to mind. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jayhake)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/135587</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:17:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/135585/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-135585</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Dickerson 7612
<br>
7.5 feet 4wt, 2PC 12 Ferrule
<br>
Measured over varnish (deduct about .006)
<br>
.070
<br>
.086
<br>
.100
<br>
.114
<br>
.130
<br>
.140
<br>
.154
<br>
.167
<br>
.182
<br>
.198
<br>
.216
<br>
.224
<br>
.248
<br>
.255
<br>
.268
<br>
.276
<br>
.285
<br>
.360
<br>
.375
<br>
.375 ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jayhake)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/135585</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:04:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/135584/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-135584</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m relatively new to all this and do not have the experience of many with building and casting multiple rods, but I just completed a Payne 100 and have
been able to lawn cast it and I am very impressed both with its close-in delicacy and its power throwing a 4DT line.  It feels like a winner to me. Ray ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (raywright)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/135584</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:55:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/135563/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-135563</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Thanks to all for the suggestions so far.  Ant other ideals?
<br>
Mike ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (mtn)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/135563</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:21:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/135008/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-135008</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ You might want to check out the discussion of PY Perfectionists in the Rodmaking page. Channer&#39;s swelled-butt Perfectionist might fit your bill. Lee ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Lee Koch)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/135008</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:47:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/134423/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-134423</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Look into a Maxwell era Hunt 39-4. Richly flamed version of the blond Standard. It has a nice close up medium action with plenty of reserve power when needed.
Leonard during the Maxwell era turned out more great 4 wt rods than any other company ever has. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (PA Limestoner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/134423</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:02:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/134392/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-134392</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p align="center"><br>
I haven&#39;t seen that one posted. Was there one, or are you referring to one that shopuld have been? If there was, got the numbers?
<br>
So far I&#39; quite happy with a Payne 100 copy, but I&#39;d think a 7612 would have a little more low-end grunt.
<br>
<br></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (HexaMaineiac)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/134392</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:08:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/134248/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html#reply-134248</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The Dickerson 7612 would fit nicely here. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (seattlesetters)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/134248</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:34:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ 7 1/2' 4wt tapers ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/23581/t/7-1-2-4wt-tapers.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;m in the process of getting a new blank built and was looking for ideals for a 7 1/2&#39;4wt.  I originally thought about a Garrison the 2 tapers I&#39;d
considered was a 206 and a 209.  Yes the 206 is mainly referenced as a 5wt and the one I cast was a true 5 but strangely I&#39;ve seen the 209 listed as a 4wt
but what didn&#39;t make sence to me was all the numbers are bigger on the 209.  Another I&#39;d thought of was a Payne 100 but I own a 100h and really
don&#39;t care for the way... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (mtn)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/23581</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:19:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>