<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Why 24 cork rings insteed 12?</title>
        <link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/24276/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Hello to all,

I have seen some rod makers that use in their handles very thin cork rings; some of them even 24 insteed 12, as I think is the most normal.

Do you know why is like that?

Greetings from Spain,

Ra.M ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:43:29 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:58:07 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137947/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137947</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <img src="http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k24/tapermaker/dr8.jpg" alt="image">

<p><br></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (tapermaker)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137947</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:58:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137945/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137945</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <img height="480" src="http://images.yuku.com/image/pjpeg/f1615a98e0f8da69afef0448e3d80f9c6ad5594.pjpg" width="640" alt="image">

<p><br></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (kermit)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137945</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:28:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137822/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137822</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ A wonderful rod Bruce, and a better story on how you acquired it!
<br>
<br>
That bass decal is a wonder!
<br>
<br>
Thanks much for taking the time to post the pictures. I enjoyed them immensely!
<br>
<br>
Bob
<br>
<br>
p.s. Your restoration work is quite fine Bruce. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobbeegee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137822</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:22:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137810/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137810</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Good evening Bob-
<br>
As per your request I&#39;m posting 7 pictures of the Heddon 14. This rod, by the way, is 9&#39;, 3/2, all sections full-length. It also came with the original
bag and the bag stiffener.
<br>
<img src="http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj205/bruce0503/Heddon%2014/106_0609.jpg" alt="image">
<br>
<br>
<img src="http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/jj205/bruce0503/Heddon%2014/137_3789.jpg" alt="image">
<br>
<br>
<img... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (BruceHandley)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137810</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 20:39:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137802/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137802</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <img src="http://images.yuku.com/image/pjpeg/18c258f981d9972a422f7eef2f812862b680076.pjpg" alt="image">

<p>The cork is good quality, no difference in feel I can notice.
<br></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (creakycane)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137802</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:26:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137799/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137799</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ With all that glue wouldn&#39;t you lose the softness?
<br>
<br>
Trout120 ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Trout120)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137799</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:15:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137769/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137769</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The thinner the cork rings the more glue-ups.
<br>
The more glue ups the more strength.
<br>
The closer the glue ups the longer the wear factor.
<br>
Albeit weight must be factored as well. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Mrdi)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137769</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:17:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137717/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137717</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Bob, I&#39;ll work on getting some pictures up later today.
<br>
 Bruce
<br>
 There&#39;s a neat story that goes with this rod, which I&#39;ll add to the pictures. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (BruceHandley)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137717</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:23:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137716/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137716</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hi Guys,  And then there are 1/16&quot; rings!  I like 1/4&quot;.  You can have better average quality.  Jay Edwards
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bluejayee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137716</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 12:20:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137700/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137700</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">BruceHandley wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <br>
  One of my Heddon rods has 1/8&quot; cork rings, this is a #14, circ. 1927. While I don&#39;t think of this rod as top of the line, its a neat rod with the
  bass decal and inter. wraps. 
  <br>
  Bruce 
  <br>
  <br>
    
</blockquote>That is a very neat rod Bruce! Could you possibly post a picture sometime?
<br>
<br>
Bob ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobbeegee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137700</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 11:13:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137683/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137683</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This question of grip styles got me to looking around at some of my rods, something I&#39;d not payed much attention to in the past.. There is a good bit
variation, even within rods made by the same makers.
<br>
 Most of my Landman rods, but not all, used 1/4&quot; cork rings. However on one of his rods he used sheet cork wrapped with wire and on another the grip and
reel seat are all one and made of lancewood or sumac. The rod with the wood grip is marked as John Landman maker and T. Conroy... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (BruceHandley)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137683</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:47:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137654/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137654</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If there is a flaw, or pit, or occlusion with a 1/4&quot; ring, it is only half as long as with a 1/2&quot; ring. 
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (canerodscom)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137654</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 08:23:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137650/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137650</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The classiest cork grips are the 1/8th inch rings as originally popularised by the KOSMIC crew.
<br>
<br>
They have a charm that other cork grips just do not have.
<br>
<br>
Your gnome
<br>
<br>
Jeff ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Gnome)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137650</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 08:08:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137643/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137643</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ They have the nicest cork I&#39;ve ever seen on a rod; completely flawless.  Where in the world did they get such cork.  There was one for sale on the forum a
couple days ago, may still be there, and the pic shows a perfect grip with no imperfections at all. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cwood)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137643</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 07:42:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137620/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137620</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Quarter-inch cork rings are more common on today&#39;s European rods, partly because those are the rings readily available.  The finished grip looks nice
because the irregularities only go for 1/4&quot; along the length of the grip.
<br>
<br>
Tim
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Tim Anderson)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137620</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 00:26:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137566/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137566</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I have no idea why a maker would use the small 1/4&quot; rings, but I sure like that &quot;look&quot;!
<br>
I don&#39;t believe I&#39;ve ever seen a rod with such a handle that was not of high quality?
<br>
<br>
Bob       <img src="http://static.yuku.com//domainskins/bypass/img/smileys/smokin.gif" alt="image"> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (bobbeegee)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137566</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:50:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137562/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137562</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Quite a few antique rods used 1/4&quot; or less rings as that&#39;s what was available in those days. It looks good - some rod makers just like that look, I
think. It&#39;s more work, but an interesting option.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (PaducahMichael)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137562</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:22:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/137561/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html#reply-137561</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ That&#39;s a good question. Is it because of the lesser grade cork being available? Wouldn&#39;t it be harder to make with the thin corks though?
<br>
<br>
I myself like the 1/2&quot; cuts.
<br>
<br>
Just wondering too.
<br>
<br>
Trout120 ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Trout120)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/137561</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:15:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Why 24 cork rings insteed 12? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/24276/t/Why-24-cork-rings-insteed-12-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hello to all,
<br>
I have seen some rod makers that use in their handles very thin cork rings; some of them even 24 insteed 12, as I think is the most normal.
<br>
Do you know why is like that?
<br>
Greetings from Spain,
<br>
Ra.M ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (caldera river)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/24276</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 17:43:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>