<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Garrison stress curves, data source?</title>
        <link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/25231/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ This is something that has bothered me for a long time. A graph is a pictorial depiction of a set of data. A Garrison stress curve is a graph
depicting a set of data. The question I have is &quot;Where did that data come from?&quot; It does not seem to me that a professional engineer would set out to
design a fly rod by drawing a curve on a piece of graph paper that represents data. What am I missing? We use these curves in several rod analysis programs to
twiddle and tweek tapers and there... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:35:58 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:23:07 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Garrison stress curves, data source? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/147116/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html#reply-147116</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hello: CORRECT. Garry was actually more interested in the development of his rod tapers, and the working of the bamboo, than he was in the craft itself. That
was a means to an end, but &quot;tweeking&quot; was in his nature, and was very much the spirit of the man. He did develop the original rod tapers while laid
up in the hospital with a nervous condition, and many of those stress curves, to him, proved out his tapering formulas. When nylon lines came in around 1946-7,
he went back to work... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (hoagy b carmichael)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/147116</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:23:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Garrison stress curves, data source? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/142366/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html#reply-142366</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">fishbum wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  ...you run head long into the fact that you must know the stresses before starting a rod design. I have no problem with finding moments for a general rod
  with a linear taper to start things off. I do find a problem with the process when we get to the part of applying stresses to get to diameter. Somewhere
  these stress were calculated beforehand and that part of the process is not in the book. Like I said in my... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (mer)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/142366</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 06:58:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Garrison stress curves, data source? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/142218/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html#reply-142218</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ OK Fishbum I see where you are coming from, and I think I have an answer. Let&#39;s to a thought experiment. Say we could send Garrison back in time with all
his knowledge to the time at which only 5 bamboo rods had been made. Garrison could do his moments analysis on these 5 rods, and compare stress curves on each.
The stress curve is used in design as a numerical evaluation of the general bending characteristics of each rod. Then, for forward design, Garrison could mix
and match or create... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (BigTJ)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/142218</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:07:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Garrison stress curves, data source? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/142191/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html#reply-142191</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hi Fishbum - I believe you are chasing something that does not exist. Good flyrod tapers are designed by people who have cast a lot of rods, and know what they
want a taper to do. Garrison&#39;s method is tool to get you there, just like the time honored thickness chart method. The advantage to Garrison&#39;s method
is that once you have designed one rod that suits you, it becomes easy to develop a series of rods of different line weights and lengths with similar casting
characteristics. I... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Tom Smithwick)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/142191</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:24:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Garrison stress curves, data source? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/142183/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html#reply-142183</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">BigTJ wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  That&#39;s what Garrison did - broke down all the little moments that add up to the bending stress that ultimately describes the theoretical arc a rod is
  bent into.
</blockquote>
<br>
So from the information given from the moments and bending stress we should be able to calculate the deflection of the rod. Is that not right?
<br>
<br>
It seems to me we are chasing our tails here. If you do a flow chart of the rod... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (fishbum)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/142183</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:16:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Garrison stress curves, data source? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/142068/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html#reply-142068</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ After breaking my own Heddon at the described location last year, I checked the rod&#39;s stress curve which I had graphed when I bought the rod.  Turns out
there is indeed a hump in the curve just below the upper set of ferrules, which made me think perhaps the curves do bear some relation to real-world stresses
on a rod.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (mattcliff)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/142068</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:39:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Garrison stress curves, data source? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/142065/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html#reply-142065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ If you look at a tip under load (fish on) you will notice that the tip near the tiptop is pointing towards the fish and so the load is not likely to break a
tip. Tips are more likely to break when a fly is stuck in a tree and the fisher yanks the rod sideways to free the fly. (A major no-no) Plus as a collector of
Heddon rods, I find that many Heddon rods are found broken at the female ferrule of the mid section, a point of high stress, limited ability to flex due to
location near the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (OldCanerods)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/142065</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:27:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Garrison stress curves, data source? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/142022/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html#reply-142022</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Fishbum,
<br>
<br>
I didn&#39;t directly answer you questions. Here are the simplest answers I can think of to each of them:
<br>
<br>
1. The data come from the dimensions and physical characteristics of the fly rod being analyzed and are based on the assumptions that Garrison made.
<br>
<br>
2. The data are generated by fairly simple functional relationships between the dimensions of the fly rod and how those translate to the bending stress
experienced by the rod.
<br>
<br>
The Garrison... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (BigTJ)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/142022</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:08:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Garrison stress curves, data source? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/142021/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html#reply-142021</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <font size="2">It does not seem to me that a professional engineer would set out to design a fly rod by drawing a curve on a piece of graph paper that
  represents data</font>
</blockquote>I am a professional engineer and although I don&#39;t use graph paper if I had been practicing in the 30&#39;s like Garrison then graph paper is
exactly what I would have used. We have EXCEL now but back then that&#39;s what they used. In fact I can&#39;t really think of another way an... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (BigTJ)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/142021</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:47:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Garrison stress curves, data source? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/142011/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html#reply-142011</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Read the book, it&#39;s all in there. The graph comes from the stresses he calculated, very painstakingly, with a slide rule. Garrison figured the moment of
inertia of the bamboo itself, the line guides and ferrules for every 5&#39; the full length of the rod, 3 TIMES. The first time is based on an assumed straight
taper, the other two are to correct the errors in the first caused by the accumulation of extra weight of the additional guides, ferrules and line as you get
closer to the butt. He... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (john channer)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/142011</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:17:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Garrison stress curves, data source? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/142006/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html#reply-142006</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Its my guees that what happened is that after alot of trial and error, good tapers were developed and the he reversred engineered his findings. However I would
like to hear from other folks as to thier thoughts on this      Lewis ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Lewis B)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/sreply/142006</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:01:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Garrison stress curves, data source? ]]></title>
			<link>http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/25231/t/Garrison-stress-curves-data-source-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p><font size="2">This is something that has bothered me for a long time. A graph is a pictorial depiction of a set of data. A Garrison stress curve is a graph
depicting a set of data. The question I have is &quot;Where did that data come from?&quot; It does not seem to me that a professional engineer would set out to
design a fly rod by drawing a curve on a piece of graph paper that represents data. What am I missing? We use these curves in several rod analysis programs to
twiddle and tweek... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (fishbum)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/25231</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:35:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>