| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
JD55 |
Newbi Frustrated |
Lead | ||
|
I followed the directions in accordance to Cattanach's book on plane tuning (sole flattened, etc.) for a vintage Stanley 9 1/2 as well as utilized the
scary sharp method to 2000 grit wet/dry to sharpen the blade to 35 degrees to ultimately make a few PMQs. However, the plane will barely remove material
without essentially forcing it to cut. What possibly could be wrong? Thanks.
|
||||
|
|
||||
oldfishbrain |
#1 | |||
|
Are you using the original iron? If so throw it out and get a Hock iron, more expensive than the plane but it will make a world of difference.
Maker of light line nodeless bamboo fly rods
avardanis@sympatico.ca |
||||
|
|
||||
Blue Quill |
#2 | |||
|
Hi JD55,
The cutting face of the blade should be approximately 45-degrees to the sole. The pitch of the blade is 20-degrees in a Stanly 9-1/2. If you sharpened the blade to 35-degrees the cutting face of your blade is 55-degrees to the sole, which is very comparable to a scraper and likely very hard to push. The upside is that you will likely never chip a node; the downside is that it may take quite a long time for you to finish your rod. Without seeing the blade, I think you either misinterpreted the instructions or set your blade-holder incorrectly when sharpening. Re-trace your steps, check that the angle is as described above, make sure the throat is set just wide enough for the shavings, and don't take cuts thicker than .005 (measure them) before you get some chops. Stick with it, and good luck. Chuck |
||||
|
|
||||
JD55 |
#3 | |||
|
My understanding was blades from vintange planes are more than adequate in comparison to new Stanleys which are supposedly lousey. The plane and blade are
approximately 40 years old. I really didn't want to invest in a new Hock blade.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Blue Quill |
#4 | |||
|
Hi JD55,
I really like Hock blades and use them myself, but you won't appreciate them until you know what you're doing. The blade you have is fine to learn with, and particularly if you are only making PMQ's. You may need to sharpen it more often than a Hock blade, but this will be good experience for you as well. Post a photo of the rod when you're done. Chuck |
||||
|
|
||||
Chad |
#5 | |||
oldfishbrain wrote: If you're really throwing perfectly good blades out, I'll be happy to take them.
JD, your blade will be fine once you have the correct angle. |
||||
|
|
||||
JD55 |
#6 | |||
|
Thanks everyone for your assistance.
Last Edited By: JD55 04/23/2009 20:36.
Edited 1 time.
|
||||
|
|
||||
tapermaker |
#7 | |||
|
before changing anything did you turn the blade over after sharpening and take the curl off the back side.if not you will never have a truely sharp edge.
Dennis
|
||||
|
|
||||
john channer |
#8 | |||
|
jd;
A freshly sharpened blade from any era Stanley should cut bamboo fine, the only difference between new blades, old blade or Hock blades is how long they will hold that edge. Go back over what you;ve done so far, something is wrong. Did you sharpen the blade bevel side down, may seem like a silly question, but it's happened before. Are you sure of the angle. I use 35 degrees with a standard block plane, it cuts fine with little effort and doesn't chip nodes as bad as a steeper angle does. Double check the throat opening, you want it open just enough for the thickness of shaving you take, also, check it after every stroke or two of the plane, a shaving or fiber that gets stuck in the throat will keep the blade from cutting. john |
||||
|
|
||||
AJ Bamboo |
#9 | |||
|
if it won't cut it is not sharp. period. any iron will work. english stanley blades are great. US stanley blades not so much. hock blades are great if you
want to spend 300% of the money for 10% better edge life.
|
||||
|
|
||||
WIHEXROD |
#10 | |||
|
Are you sure the bottom of the plane is flat. You can check this by using a Sharpie and making a criss cross on the bottom. Set the plane on a known flat
surface on a piece of sandpaper. Lightly push back and forth and check the bottom for even wear.
When you say you have to force it to cut, do you mean you have to push down hard or it is hard to push forward? Scott |
||||
|
|
||||
JD55 |
#11 | |||
|
I followed Blue Quill's advice, and resharpened the blade to 25 degrees. It ultimately removed a nice long curl of approximately .005 off a piece of bamboo
scrap with minimal effort. Thanks again.
Joe |
||||
|
|
||||
shuksanrods |
#12 | |||
|
rough plane with a shallow angle(~25 deg), final plane with a steep one (~45/50 deg), finish with a scraper.
keep your shavings thin, flip the strip often till you get an eye for balance. And practice on throw away strips till you learn good planing technique, it definately takes some practice. (i.e. pressure, holding angle, body position, etc) -jw |
||||
|
|
||||
Blue Quill |
#13 | |||
|
Tight glue lines are a sign of quality and require careful planing and strip finishing. However, the rod will be stronger if you finish the strip with as
coarse a surface as possible while still providing a straight/tight/sharp glue line.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Titelines |
#14 | |||
Blue Quill wrote:Chuck, That all depends on what kind of adhesive you are using to glue the strips together. A roughened surface, with little grooves may work well with a water based glue, like Titebond (or any of it's variants), but will actually weaken the bond on many chemically cured adhesives like epoxies. The epoxies end up having a weaker bond by the excess of the adhesive in joint. Epoxy itself has a terrible lack of strength, both in shear and in tension. It gets is biggest boost of strength in the tightest matrix. The least amount of epoxy to effect the bond is the correct amount of epoxy in the joint. There are many articles out there on preparing a surface to be bonded with epoxies. Here's an article written by Ralph O'Quinn, the fella that supplies the U-40 brand of rod making epoxies: Surface Preparation. Note: this applies mainly to adhesives that use a chemical reaction to cure, not air hardening or air curing adhesives. Mark
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Blue Quill |
#15 | |||
|
Hi Titelines,
I use epoxy, and it is definitely stronger when bonding on matte/sanded bamboo than when bonding smooth bamboo. Years ago I took a piece of waxed paper and poured several "cookies" of the different adhesives I was considering (epoxy, PVA, polyurethane, UF) and let them cure. Hands-down the epoxy cookies were the most difficult to break or pull apart, proving they had the highest intrinsic strength. It was winter, so I left them outside, and the epoxy cookies were easily the most difficult to shatter, and I boiled the cut-off butt sections of blanks made with the same adhesives as well, and the epoxy always held up the best. With the exception of cyanoacrylates and similar adhesives, the bonds of all adhesives normally used in woodworking benefit from a less-than-smooth surface. Also, there are epoxies and there are epoxies. Some epoxies, including the one I use, actually penetrate the bamboo to some extent much like resourcinol (I checked using epoxy colorant from a boat supply store). Regarding the Ralph O'Quinn article you have attached; he's referring to the bond strength and failure of uncoated graphite versus coated graphite, which is a material delamination problem and not an adhesive problem. He's also representing a company which sells polyurethane products. There are a lot of good adhesives out there, and they all have advantages and disadvantages as relates to rod making. Virtually any of them are technically superior to the adhesives used on classic bamboo rods, and they are still with us, so it may be a matter of degrees. But from the tests I have done on my own, I prefer epoxy. Chuck |
||||
|
|
||||
Titelines |
#16 | |||
|
Chuck,
There are "degrees" of smoothness. Matte, which gives the "water break" surface, is much different than something sanded with a sanding medium larger than 600 grit. It all depends on what you are adhering, and what adhesive you are using to adhere, as to the strength of the matrix. Epoxy is quite different from other adhesives that use air curing or hardening. Epoxy gives a much better bond the thinner the joint is. That's not to say the joint should be starved of epoxy, but any epoxy more than a simply wetted surface weakens the joint. If you don't believe me, please have a read: Bond Line Thickness. Epoxies, and other adhesives that chemically cure, rely on a chemical bond to adhere the objects in the matrix. Air curing or hardening adhesives depend on a mechanical bond to adhere objects in their matrix. The chemical-cure adhesives tend to shrink very little as they cure, while the air-cure adhesives tend to shrink much more in the joint. Since the chemical-cue adhesives shrink very little, any excess adhesive in the joint, whether do to roughing gouges, or joint gap, will do nothing more than weaken the joint. If epoxy was strong enough by itself, you see Corvettes running around with no fiberglass in them, or composite aircraft with molded flying surfaces having nothing other than the adhesive in them. There really is very little strength in just the adhesive alone. The bond requires the least amount of adhesive to form the matrix between the adhesive and the bonded surfaces. It doesn't matter whether you are talking about adhering one piece of graphite to another, or one piece of cane to another, or one piece of graphite to one piece of cane. I use Epoxy on all my rods too. But if you are going to base your usage on a certain kind of adhesive, you really should understand the properties of that adhesive. I've been using epoxies (all different kinds - laminating, fill, joint bonding, metal filling, conductive and many others since the early 70's). Each has it's own use, each has it's own properties. But the common thing about epoxies, the thinner the application of the adhesive to the surface (to a point, as shown by the article above), the stronger the joint. The more epoxy left between the two surfaces in the joint, the weaker the joint will be. I pointed out Ralph's article because he sells a lot of different kind of adhesives, polyurethane and epoxy included. His article talked about the best surfacing for an epoxy bond. The man knows of which he speaks, since he's been in the industry for a long time, and has worked with the kinds of adhesives we use for making fishing poles. A bonding surface is a bonding surface is a bonding surface. How you prepare that bonding surface goes a long way to the strength of the joint that is formed when the adhesive is applied, and the matrix is formed. Mark
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Blue Quill |
#17 | |||
|
Hi Titelines,
Obviously any of the adhesives we are talking about is weaker than bamboo or graphite, and the less glue required to bond the surfaces the better. I would believe this is self evident. The surface created by 400 paper has net striations less than .0003 deep. Remember, it's sandpaper not a toothing tool; the particles aren't arranged in a line. I am calling this a matte finish in the interest of conveying the concept to the forum members. If you prefer to be literal about this (water break); I'm sorry but I'm not providing a micro-inch number or EDM/Charmise reference for roughing-up bamboo with sandpaper. I have been making bamboo rods professionally for a long time, I have made hundreds of rods, I follow all the tips and procedures I share, and I have never had a delamination. If any of my advice is ever in conflict with your personal experience or anything you have read, I strongly recommend you avoid it. Chuck |
||||
|
|
||||
Titelines |
#18 | |||
|
Chuck,
That's not what you said above. Your words, "However, the rod will be stronger if you finish the strip with as coarse a surface as possible while still providing a straight/tight/sharp glue line" do not agree with your latest reply. I was just pointing out that "coarse" and epoxy joints do not go well together. Just curious. How did you measure the .0003" depth of the striations left by the 400 grit sandpaper? 400 grit particles can range in size from .0018" to .00043". Both of which are larger than what you say your depth of striations are. Just as you, I've been working with many different types of epoxy for many, many years, from laminating epoxy, to filler epoxy, to coating epoxy, to layup epoxy and many other uses. When somebody puts out information that is incorrect, it needs to be countered with facts. All you've tossed out so far is anecdotal evidence that this is the way it should be. I've offered information from the manufacturers and research. If you choose not to believe what they are saying, that's entirely all right for whatever you want to do, however, for those who want to understand on how to get the most from their choice of adhesive, it just ain't so. Mark
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Chad |
#19 | |||
|
Gather 'round!!! It's the fight to see who knows more about epoxy!!! Young and old alike will hail the champion. Babes in bikinis will flock to him and
hang on his every word.
"Did you know ladies that epoxy is quite different from other adhesives?" "You're so cool, Mr. Epoxy. Can you tell us one more time about net striations less than .0003 deep?"
Sorry for the sarcasm, gentlemen. You are each giving some great information here. It's just that when we start arguing about such things, the line between Bamboo Artist and Basement Dork gets pretty blurry. And I'm really trying to convince my wife that what I'm doing downstairs is the former.
|
||||
|
|
||||
oddsnrods |
Just an idea... | #20 | ||
|
If a water-stone is used to sharpen a plane blade, then it must be kept flat otherwise the edge of the blade will follow any slight cupping altering the angle.
I have found that the resulting blade, that you think may be sharp, fails to cut properly and takes too much pressure to engage for fine work. As far a glue
lines are concerned, rod-makers often forget that with modern glues (like Urac) very little is needed, certainly not enough to squeeze out any excess, which
results in too much weight being needed if a binder is used, which results in twisted tips. Personally, I don't think that it matters if the strips are
roughened up prior to gluing.
Last Edited By: oddsnrods 04/27/2009 14:54.
Edited 2 times.
|
||||
|
|
||||