| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
newbie5317 |
What is "parabolic action"? |
Lead | ||
|
Can someone please tell me what "parabolic action" and "Non-parabolic" action is?
|
||||
|
|
||||
johnr |
parabolic action | #1 | ||
|
from a "Google" search
Rod Actions and TapersSlow, Medium and Fast ActionsA slow rod is one that will flex down its full length.
Progressive TaperA progressive taper is a rod which has a smooth, even increase in thickness all the way to the
handle.
Compound TaperThis is basically a progressive taper, but the increase in diameter is varied along the length of the rod. Most of the old classic tapers were made to a compound taper. ParabolicThis type of rod will flex more in the butt section when a heavy load is applied.
|
||||
|
|
||||
firehole |
#2 | |||
|
I had a PHY Para15 which wasn't slow but medium-fast IMHO.
Dennis |
||||
|
|
||||
SecondHandWolf |
Para Action | #3 | ||
|
Saints and Wizards and Animal-Guides preserve us. You could also ask what is life? Why are we here? What do we mean to everything/anything? Do men really
want to understand women? What is the unifying field theory of atomic and sub-atomic physics that solves the current impasse of dark energy's affect on
the constant of gravity? ............ But for a good try at an answer, check out Ed Engles book Spitting Cane and read in the section on George Maurer, bless
his life and talents, and his understanding of a parabolic action.
Just remember, that rod action is a matter of taste and taste is a matter of passion and passion is a matter of spirit and spirits come in different proofs. |
||||
|
|
||||
newbie5317 |
#4 | |||
|
I think someone was quoted as saying to the effect of the best action is the one that feels the best in your hand. Seems terms like 'parabolic action'
fit into that category.
|
||||
|
|
||||
quashnet |
#5 | |||
|
The question was asked a month ago in the rodbuilding and restoration forum, and several people made helpful comments. See:
http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/topic/14615
Quashnet's Paul H. Young Rod Database has photos and descriptions of 290 PHY Co. rods, plus catalogs, accessories,
etc. Thank you to all who continue to send me PHY rod photos and info.
|
||||
|
|
||||
greendrake ll |
#6 | |||
newbie5317 wrote: Not in my hand.I have a strong dislike for parabolic rods. |
||||
|
|
||||
greendrake ll |
#7 | |||
SecondHandWolf wrote: NOPE,Not if they're smart! Understanding them might very well cause us to start using the same twisted and illogical way of thinking!!!! Running and ducking from the other 6% of the forum
|
||||
|
|
||||
Soft Hackle |
#8 | |||
|
The parabolics I have tried were noticeably tip heavy, great roll casters but not delicate dry fly type rods, quite powerful though.
|
||||
|
|
||||
Lee Koch |
#9 | |||
|
I think that maybe the most important thing for a newbie coming over from Graphite to know about paras is that they generally demand a significantly different
casting stroke, one that sort of calls for pauses as the casted line unfurls, then flexes the rod deep into the handle, at which point you can start to move
forward (or backward as the case may be). For me, out of all modern bamboo rods, the hard-core paras require a casting cadence farthest from that usually
employed by "fast-graphite" casters. For that reason, I tihnk, it's rare for a newbie to move directly from graphite to parabolics. Paras are
treasured (by those who treasure them) for their great weight-to-power ratio, since almost all the bamboo is actively used to project line forward and backward
(as opposed to say, the top 1/3 of the rod...), and also for the great "feel" that they transmit from fish to tippet to line to rod to hand. They
seem an acquired taste to me, just as oysters ("Twas a brave man what first ate an oyster"), asparagus, tete de veau and vin jaune are. Hmmm, I
guess it's supper time.
All the best, Lee |
||||
|
|
||||
thegubster |
#10 | |||
johnr wrote: What more could a guy ask for? That about says it for me. Thanks John!
|
||||
|
|
||||
Boonut |
#11 | |||
|
Would a Granger fall into the progressive or compound category?
|
||||
|
|
||||