Thanks,
Mike D.
http://battenkill.tripod.com
P.S. If anyone has an original brass cap for a Montague tube they're looking to sell, then you've found your buyer.
| Author | Comment | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
BKill |
Montague questions |
Lead | ||
|
A friend has a 8'6" 3/2 Manitou, and I'm wondering how that rod's action compares to that of a Redwing of similar length. I very much enjoyed
the Manitou with a WF6F longbelly line, and I would considering buying a similar rod if I could find one. It seems as if the Redwings are somewhat more
common. Hence the question. Also, approximately when were the Manitous produced?
Thanks, Mike D. http://battenkill.tripod.com P.S. If anyone has an original brass cap for a Montague tube they're looking to sell, then you've found your buyer. |
||||
|
|
||||
Dustnstuff |
Montague question | #1 | ||
|
Mike,
The top three rods made by Montague were: Power Built, Manitou, and the Redwing. They started these brands in 1932. Prior to that date, only a few rods made by Montague had a name. Most were sold to the trade by inventory number. The change in management that year started a new and different approach which took Montague from a wholesaler to a retailer. The Monitou in that length is one of the best rods to fish with, and if you are lucky enough to find one, buy it. Most of the ebay examples I've watched have sold in the $300-500 range. Dustnstuff |
||||
|
|
||||
TheMontyMan |
Montague Manitou and Red Wings... | #2 | ||
|
BKill,
I think the Manitous and Red Wings were fairly similar in construction, and should compare fairly closely to one another. The main thing to keep in mind is that both of these rods were made in multiple weights - Light Trout, Medium Trout, and Bass Weight. You should refer to this earlier discussion to get up to speed on this issue - http://clarksclassicflyrodforum.yuku.com/reply/121937#reply-121937 . You'll need to be careful to compare apples to apples, otherwise you'll be disappointed in your comparison. It sounds like your friend probably has a Manitou Medium Trout model, since it fishes well with a 6 wt. line. I'd suggest that you try a Red Wing Medium Trout model for a similar action. Medium Trout models are the most common found today. Probably 90% of the high-end Montague rods I've seen have been Medium Trout models. If you want help finding one, drop me a line. Dustnstuff, We need to catch up and compare notes. I've collected quite a few advertisements since we last spoke, and I've made several interesting discoveries. Up until recently, I was under the assumption that the Manitou and Red Wing models were introduced around 1932. I recently found both models advertised as early as 1928. For now, I'm assuming this was the start of their long-lived production. I have a hunch that Varney may have left Montague around the same time. I believe that Montague never switched to a retail, direct-to-consumer approach. Instead, I believe they increased their marketing efforts towards building a strong brand name, and directing customers to the dealers. Their advertisements appear to be consistent from early on, and continuing until the end, with messages such as this one, from an early catalog -
"MONTAGUE RODS for all kinds of angling are sold in nearly every city and town in this country. Large stocks of Montague Rods are carried by the
leading distributors of America and are most conveniently available to your dealer. If your dealer does not have the particular rod you want, he can readily
get it for you."
This type of message appears to be consistent throughout Montague's advertising before, and after 1932. I think there was a change in the early 30's, in the form of expanded marketing campaigns and spending more money on name brand recognition. My guess is that the purpose was to drive buyers to retailers, not a push for direct retail sales. By this point, Montague was already wildly successful as a manufacturer/wholesaler, and there would be no advantage in going around their retailers by selling direct to the consumer. These are just my opinions, based on a cursory study of their advertising campaigns. . . . Rex TheMontyMan |
||||
|
|
||||
Whitefish Press |
#3 | |||
|
1928 is the correct date. They came out of receivership that year with a new set of executives who quickly phased out trade rods (and reels all together) and
began an aggressive advertising campaign. Apparently one of the costliest in history for a tackle firm up to that date -- $100,000! That's easily a million
dollar ad campaign today. Remember it's all print ads too; oh, and they commissioned the missing (but dearly sought) two films they made to promote
Montague and fly fishing. Wouldn't you like to find those! 1932 also brought changes with the sale of Montague to outside sources, which finalized what had
already been happening since 1928.
-- Dr. Todd |
||||
|
|
||||
darrelll |
#4 | |||
TheMontyMan wrote:
Last Edited By: darrelll 05/06/2009 01:32.
Edited 1 time.
|
||||
|
|
||||
hopkintoncane |
Manitou vs Redwing Casting Impressions | #5 | ||
|
I have both rods in the Medium Trout 8.5 foot 3/2 configuration. The Redwing is medium progressive. The Manitou is slower, and feels slightly parabolic. I like
the way the Redwing casts better, always have. I know that runs counter to the quality progression of the Montague line, but thats just my personal opinion.
Both rods will cast 5 or 6, although with DT6 the Manitou starts to gasp for air after about 40 feet, and casting becomes more of a caster concentration game.
Rex et al can chime in, but I suspect the Redwing cane was cooked longer, which resulted in a more resilient taper. Todd
|
||||
|
|
||||
bamboo4u2 |
#6 | |||
|
Todd,
I too have both rods. I believe you are correct about the Redwing being "cooked" longer, appearing to be made of flamed cane while the Manitou is not. Also the tapers are different giving the Redwing more of a swelled butt and somewhat more backbone than the Manitou. To me, the Manitou makes for a softer presentation than the Redwing of equal length. I think Montague made a light trout, medium trout as well as a "bass" taper Redwing in several lengths some of the years of production. Manitous were made in light trout, medium trout and maybe even a "bass" taper (I haven't seen a bass taper Manitou ....but I do own a 9 1/2 foot Manitou Steelhead/bass rod with the fighting butt). As Rex pointed out, it's difficult to compare apples to apples with the higher grade Montague rods because of so many weights and lengths within models in a given year of production. Making things even harder is that apparently Montague changed the tapers within the models from year to year. For example, you may just love how fast your Ford Mustang accelerates on a straightaway and I may dislike how slowly my Ford Mustang accelerates......upon further examination we both may own Mustangs but yours may be a 2008 Shelby GT500KR and mine may be 1966 straight 6. Regards and WDE!! Bob L "If you're not a part of the solution, there's good money to be made in prolonging the problem." --Robert Earl James
Last Edited By: bamboo4u2 05/06/2009 16:27.
Edited 1 time.
|
||||
|
|
||||
TheMontyMan |
Manitou vs. Red Wing... | #7 | ||
|
I've seen dozens of both models, representing every era of production. Both darrelll and Boo4U2's observations are correct, in my opinion. The
earlier rods of both of these models tended to have more intermediates, darker cane, and a more "custom" look to them. Later on, they both began to
look more like a production rod, and tended to have lighter, less flamed cane.
Boo4U2 mentioned the Red Wing apparently being "cooked" longer. I believe that statement is true of the older models. I think there were 2 different processes employed that would affect the color of the cane. First, the Manitou and Red Wing were heat treated, supposedly for strength. Then they were flamed on the outside to produce a dark coloration. Rod models all the way down to the Rapidan were often flamed for looks, but only the higher-end rods were heat treated for strength. . . . Rex TheMontyMan |
||||
|
|
||||
darrelll |
Anyone have a Redwing Light Trout 8.5' rod? | #8 | ||
|
I own a bunch of Medium Trout 8.5' Redwings but was never able to grab a Light Trout model. Anyone have one that they have fished? If so, please tell me
about the action.
|
||||
|
|
||||
baetisrodhani |
Light Trout Red Wing | #9 | ||
|
Hi,
I just received an 8'6 Red Wing, red spacer era, that seems quite delicate. What would the ferrule sizes be for a "Light Trout" version ? Cheers ! Giles |
||||
|
|
||||
bamboo4u2 |
#10 | |||
|
Giles,
I'm out of town so I can't measure the ferrules on my 8 1/2' Redwings but I believe I read in a post somewhere that for some reason the Light Trout model has 9 guides including the stripper and the Medium Trout model has 10 guides. Or it may just be another attack of CRS. Regards and WDE!!! Bob L. "I want either less corruption or more opportunity to participate in it." --Robert Earl James |
||||
|
|
||||
lewis2dl |
#11 | |||
|
I have a light trout model and a medium trout model. The light trout has 4 guides on the tip section and 5 on the medium trout tip section. I think bamboo4u2
is correct in his assessment of the number of guides on these two models of Redwing.
Dean
Last Edited By: lewis2dl 05/15/2009 10:02.
Edited 1 time.
|
||||
|
|
||||
darrelll |
Manitou Bait Caster | #12 | ||
|
As I continue to look through my collection, I continue to be amazed with some of the rods I'm finding. I found a Manitou bait caster, 2/1 with correct
labeled bag and labeled tube. I'd guess a pre-WWII rod late 30's, black ivoroid reel seat, 1/4" cork rings (very unusual), aluminum butt plate,
but not a Landman type seat, all agate line guides and tip top (missing agate ring) and it needs a little bit of work. I have written on the tag that I bought
it in '03 but I have no recollection of buying it... LOL. However, I don't recall ever seeing another Manitou baitcaster... How about you guys, have
you seen or own any baitcasters of Redwing or Manitou grade? I also have a Manitou salmon rod around here (somewhere) but I recall it is a late era I believe.
The early Monty's and Varney's really captivate my attention. I'm having a ball rediscovering my collection... I opened a Monty black tube and pull out a 9' rod in a Manitou labeled bag. I measure the mid section and am surprised that it is a 9' rod as I thought I only owned 9.5' Manitous, but as I study it, I looked at the label and was surprised but disappointed that it is in fact a Splitswitch and not a Manitou. The varnish is melted and it is sticky... but the quality is very surprising! I've owned many Splitswitch's and some were convertible rods and nothing too exciting. But this rod... the wraps are the same colors as the Manitou, the reelseat is gorgeous with being all black and delicate ring. This has to be a very early Splitswitch as this is the best quality of this model, a pity it is in need of restoration. Next, I'm gonna start looking for my Kosmics and Izaak Waltons... I believe I have at least 2 of each. The Kosmics are in poor condition and I have one Walton that should be in excellent condition... Still can't find my early Orvis salmon rod... @!#!@$@!#@#
Last Edited By: darrelll 07/06/2009 02:45.
Edited 1 time.
|
||||
|
|
||||
TheMontyMan |
Red Wing 8'6" Light Trout... | #13 | ||
|
Darrelll,
I have an 8'6" Red Wing Light Trout rod that is actually marked as "Light Trout" on the rod sock label. It is from the late 1920's, with a nickel silver sliding band reel seat, lots of intermediates in groups of 5 wraps, and fairly dark flaming of the cane. It is an amazing casting rod!! It would fall between a 2 weight and a 3 weight on today's scale. I used it for about a third of my fishing last summer, and caught over 100 trout on it. It's one of my favorite go-to rods. I've never seen a Manitou or Red Wing bait caster. These would be some sweet rods. I have a couple of early Splitswitch non-combo rods, and they are beautiful, high-end rods. I believe the cane work and hardware are the same level as the Red Wing, except for the number of guides and they have nickel silver rolled welt ferrules, instead of hand welted. The windings are beautiful, and they cast very nicely. I fished a Splitswitch Combo last weekend for the first time, and was not disappointed. It fished nicely, better than the Rapidans I've fished, but not nearly in the class of the Red Wings and Fishkills. I also fished a 9' Fishkill Medium Trout last weekend. That rod throws line like a cannon! I was using a 4 wt. Sylk line, and could have used a 5 or 6 wt. though. I could nearly cast to my backing, while sitting in my kayak. If I add a couple of guides, and a heavier line, I'll be casting into the next county (and I'm not a great caster). I look forward to seeing some of your re-discoveries!! . . . Rex TheMontyMan |
||||
|
|
||||
OldCanerods |
#14 | |||
|
Rex,
Darrell has jumped on me for years about my love for Splitswitches. I've got a couple of both the combo and pure fly rod versions and, like you, love the fly rod version. Older ones are better rods, IMHO. I had a Montague Fishkill baitcaster that I gave away to my niece's son after refinishing it for him. Got some other Montague baitcasters here that I can't recall the models. (If marked) I'll also need to pull a few 8'6" Monty rods and see any are light models. |
||||
|
|
||||
TheMontyMan |
#15 | |||
|
Don,
Most people seem to pass up the Splitswitches, probably because they think it only came in a combo rod, so they tend to go for pretty cheap. Actually, I believe the non-fly model came first, then the combo. I've picked up quite a few (too many) of them on <the big online auction>. I totally agree that the earlier versions seem better. I have a couple of them on wooden forms, with the nickel silver sliding band reel seat. They need some TLC before I can fish them, but they are beautiful just as they are. Darrelll, If I'm not mistaken, some 9' and 9'6" rods were also made in a Light Trout taper. I have at least one 9' Light Trout Red Wing, and maybe a 9'6" as well. I also have 1 or 2 French Rivers that are a Light Trout taper. I'll have to check the lengths on those to be sure. . . . Rex TheMontyMan |
||||
|
|
||||
darrelll |
#16 | |||
|
Well, I bought a few of the late era Splitswitch combo rods and I thought they were crap. However, I think I have one early fly rod that is a decent rod, with
NS ferrules. My combos were all brass plated ferrules and cast like a tomato stick... Maybe I'd better take a second look and perhaps re-evaluate...
OldCanerods wrote: |
||||
|
|
||||
uppercreek |
Montague Manitou Bait Caster | #17 | ||
|
Very interesting info. I love Monty's, in part because my first bamboo fly rod was a sweet little Kingfisher/Montague 7 1/2 ft. 3/2 that Darrell helped me
identify about 10 years ago. Darrelll's post inspired me to pull out my Montague Manitou bait caster and take a few photos. I got it at a Florida antique
tackle show this spring. It is 5 ft. and weighs 4.1 ounces. Note the Landman reel seat, swelled butt, agate guides, and the ferrule plug(!). Mine has 1/2 inch
cork sections. I don't see too many split bamboo Montague casting rods, much less high end ones. Anyone have a Manitou casting rod tube? I would trade a
Trail casting rod tube for a Manitou.
I also have an early Splitswitch fly rod 8 1/2 ft. A very nice taper. Kevin
|
||||
|
|
||||
TheMontyMan |
Sweeeet!! | #18 | ||
|
Now that's a sweet looking bait rod!!
The Landman style reel seat is a beauty!! This seat probably dates your rod to the late 1920's. I love the dark cane. I have a Manitou fly rod with nearly identical cane coloring, signature windings, and ferrules. Thanks for sharing!! . . . Rex TheMontyMan |
||||
|
|
||||
OldCanerods |
#19 | |||
|
I've got a couple of questions regarding Montague:
1) Did they make their own ferrules? If so, then at which plant? (Rod or reel?) There must have been some remaining parts on stock at the end of production - sold for scrap? 2) What happened to all the ferrule dies? Sold for scrap? 3) I believe that Sewell Dutton bought out the Montague bamboo operation, did he get the ferrules and dies along with the remaining bamboo stock? 4) T&T bought out Dutton, so I wonder if they have any Montague information that's not published? |
||||
|
|
||||
TheMontyMan |
Montague Questions... | #20 | ||
|
OldCanerods,
Answers to your questions, to the best of my knowledge... 1) I believe Montague made all of their own ferrules and reel seats, with few, if any exceptions.
From their beginnings around 1856 the were known for both their high quality metal craftsmanship, their ability to turn wood (of any kind) and their ability
to split and plane cane to create a high quality fishing rod. With their acquisition of the Chubb factory in 1890, they had a new source of high quality
ferrules and reel seats. From all indications, the Chubb factory continued to run fairly autonomously up until the early 30's, producing their own
hardware. There is some crossover between Montague and Chubb as far as rods and hardware. I believe Montague (the parent company) utilized some of the
higher-end Chubb ferrules for a number of their high end rods.
2) I have no idea what happened to the metal working machinery.
I don't have any information that tells me which plants made their ferrules, but I believe the rod factories were already creating a wide range of ferrules before the reel making took off in a big way. Montague and Chubb both did a huge business in supplying hardware to the rod building and rebuilding industry. Some people have estimated that over half of the company's annual sales came from the sale of their rod components. That's one of the primary problems plaguing collectors today. From the 1860's until the mid 1950's, any rod builder, supplier or local hardware store could buy or sell Montague hardware, cane blanks, cork, and even the same silk used in production. They even sold kits (through their reseller/jobber channels) to individuals that included all of the parts for someone to build their own "Montague" rod. 3) I'm assuming the machinery went to Sewell N. Dunton & Sons, but I haven't tracked the machinery (yet). 4) I haven't followed the machinery from Montague to Dunton to T&T. Maybe someone out there has... TheMontyMan |
||||
|
|
||||