I guess for some there may be some merit in a Rod builder 1 versus Rod builder 2 debate. I'm not sure I do
but it may at least clear the air about some things, so here we go with
T vs E:
I wrote this in response to a statement Greg made about Edwards being the equal of TH&P:
Greg
Of the four Kosmic men, Eustis brought the least to the table. As of 1890, Thomas had served as shop foreman for Leonard for some period and Payne had been a
machinist for something near 20 years. Loman Hawes is said to have been the genius behind the Leonard beveler that had first been built nearly 15 years prior,
and it was he who built (or designed) the Kosmic beveler. Edwards' talent was all in his eyes when he came out of Leonard, not in his hands. That
wouldn't come for a decade or more after leaving Leonard. I won't argue that Edwards did fine work once he got his feet under him, (and I'm going
to intentionally avoid any discussion of price) but it was his association
with Leonard and Kosmic that gave his name marketability in the first place. His credentials looked good on paper but
there was nothing of substance until he'd been gone from Leonard for better than 20 years, and I think his debt to Thomas has been vastly undervalued. Had
they not been neighbors I don't know if we could have a discussion about Edwards as a rodmaker today.
Thomas' family offered stability and support, and he left his home town of Brownville with a small-town work ethic. He never stopped working or making
rods, from the time he joined Leonard till his death. His career spanned something over 40 years, while Eustis was a rod maker for under 20 years. Again, that Edwards did fine work is to
me inarguable, but he had no established rod making skills until the 19-teens. He was always years behind the rest of the 'Leonard gang' though he
caught up with them shortly before he died.
